havent seen anyone speak about this yet so validity can be called into question
it is possible that we have finished our cycle, which is actually a continuation from 2013 & 2017
a triple-three here shows how that could be possible with what we would of referred to as wave 4, taking for granted you have the tolerance to look at something this messy
inside the primary triple-three is another triple-three which is composed of zigzags, the only contingency that could be addressed is the fact that the 2nd wave (X) on the primary triple-three should be using 0.854 instead of 1.236 - we can easily use 0.654 after the impulse post-covid and we arrive at the same spot, its just that impulse needs to be evaluated (which probably includes inserting another complex correction somewhere)
could a correction of this complexity be honest or legit? human behaviour is odd
it is possible that we have finished our cycle, which is actually a continuation from 2013 & 2017
a triple-three here shows how that could be possible with what we would of referred to as wave 4, taking for granted you have the tolerance to look at something this messy
inside the primary triple-three is another triple-three which is composed of zigzags, the only contingency that could be addressed is the fact that the 2nd wave (X) on the primary triple-three should be using 0.854 instead of 1.236 - we can easily use 0.654 after the impulse post-covid and we arrive at the same spot, its just that impulse needs to be evaluated (which probably includes inserting another complex correction somewhere)
could a correction of this complexity be honest or legit? human behaviour is odd